SciTechEdit International Blog

Commentary and helpful information for communicating your scientific.

How to Avoid Plagiarism

The use of works, words, and ideas without attribution of citation is plagiarism. Most everyone knows that passing off someone else's work as your own is plagiarism, but other more common types of plagiarism are less widely understood. Plagiarism, even inadvertent plagiarism, can damage a researcher's reputation, and may also affect the researcher's institution, funding, and future opportunities in science.

What is plagiarism?

A definition of plagiarism from

"1. An act or instance of using or closely imitating the language and thoughts of another author without authorization and the representation of that author's work as one's own, as by not crediting the original author."

"2. A piece of writing or other work reflecting such unauthorized use or imitation."


Stolen words and ideas can both be considered plagiarism. STE How to Avoid Plagiarism rev title



"But can words and ideas really be stolen?"

"According to U.S. law, the answer is yes. The expression of original ideas is considered intellectual property and is protected by copyright laws, just like original inventions. Almost all forms of expression fall under copyright protection as long as they are recorded in some way (such as a book or computer file)."

So not only is plagiarism of words and ideas theft, it can also come with legal ramifications of copyright violations.

In this era of Google search, Copyscape, CrossCheck, iThenticate, and other online plagiarism detectors, it is extremely easy to check whether a paper has been plagiarized in whole or in part. 

With English as the language of science, scientists with English as a second language may be tempted to copy sentences or even whole paragraphs from other papers. Other countries may also have a different view of plagiarism, one that is looser and slacker than that of the journal publisher locations. However, many science journals will check your paper for plagiarism before publishing, and, if detected, demand corrections or reject the manuscript. 

Plagiarism is often inadvertent, but some plagiarism is by choice, and this is completely unethical, fraudulent, can be illegal, and detrimental to science as well as one's career as a scientist. Especially the theft of another's ideas - intellectual theft - passed off as one's own - this is the worst type of plagiarism. 


Types of Plagiarism:

Direct Plagiarism - The "borrowing" or "copying" of another's words, images, or ideas and representing them as one's own. This may be inadvertent or overt. Copying and pasting text or images from published work and doing so without quotes and/or citations is plagiarism. Small adjustments or paraphrasing while keeping the main content is still considered plagiarism. It is better to over-cite small sections of text you use than not. Keep in mind, however, that copying entire and large sections of text, even with quotations or citations, should be avoided. 

Intellectual Plagiarism - This is the theft of the ideas and works of another without giving credit, and presenting the work falsely as your own. This misrepresentation will yield an immediate rejection by science journals. This dishonesty by the plagiarist is the epitome of theft and fraud. Plagiarizing ideas is unacceptable and destroys the integrity of scientific research.

When writing a manuscript, it is common for authors to copy and paste ideas and sentences from other works with the intention of later rewriting and citing the text. During the process of writing (particularly if several authors are involved), this text can become incorporated into the manuscript unchanged and/or uncited. Whenever copying such text, use different fonts and text colors, and always take the time to note the source so that it is clear to you later and to other authors that this text needs to be rewritten and properly cited.

Replication of research methods from previously published work, without citation - While this is less severe than stealing ideas, it is not necessary as most methods can be rewritten. First, always check with the Instructions to Authors of the journal to which you plan to submit your manuscript. Some journals encourage using previously published text of methods verbatim (provided that you cite the original work).

If you find yourself having difficulty re-writing the methods, start with a new file (blank screen) and write down how the methods were performed as if you were telling them to a colleague or student. Refer to your lab notebook to make sure that the values and parameters are accurate for your experiment. Once done, compare your version with the published version to add any important details. For some well-established methods, you do not need to provide all of the details, just those that allow a reasonably trained scientist to replicate your findings (even if they have to refer to the paper you cited). It is best to cite where the method has been used before, and described in greater detail to allow the reader to check for additional details. 

Self-Plagiarism - Some may think that it is acceptable to re-use one's own work in a new paper as they are not actually stealing, but they may be wrong. Once published, many publishers, and not the authors, own the content of the paper. The copyright of open access articles is sometimes owned by the author, so be sure to check if you own the copyright to any text you choose to repurpose.

Inadvertent Plagiarism - Oftentimes an author will copy and paste language from another paper claiming that it was said better by the original paper. This too is plagiarism.  

We at SciTechEdit International are experts at working with non-native English-speaking scientists, and at providing suggestions for restructuring a common phrase without adding to the complexity or wordiness. 

Most instances of plagiarism of text and image can be avoided by citing the original work.


Consquences of Plagiarism:

In this global age of the internet and online plagiarism trackers, plagiarism in a scientific paper will not go unnoticed. 

If the plagiarized work is published, that is not the end of potential trouble for the author. The online site, Retraction Watch, is the watchdog of plagiarized papers, especially for those papers with ideas or methods that have been stolen, faked, or misrepresented. Intellectual dishonesty and faking data will most likely lead to retraction of the paper, the ruined reputation of the author, termination of employment, and the loss of future funding. 

Minor or inadvertent plagiarism will be brought to the attention of the author pre-publication by the journal to be corrected. 

Plagiarism of ideas - intellectual plagiarism - will be rejected outright by the journal with a demand for an explanation. 

Self-Plagiarism - You must check the journal rules on self-plagiarized work under their Author Guidelines or Author Instructions as each journal may have a different philosophy regarding self-plagiarism. Some journals are stricter than others, and if the rules are not followed, can put publication of the author's paper in jeopardy. As an example, here is what Nature journals say about self-plagiarism:

"Duplicate publication, sometimes called self-plagiarism, occurs when an author reuses substantial parts of his or her own published work without providing the appropriate references. This can range from getting an identical paper published in multiple journals, to 'salami-slicing', where authors add small amounts of new data to a previous paper."

"Plagiarism can be said to have clearly occurred when large chunks of text have been cut-and-pasted. Such manuscripts would not be considered for publication in a Nature journal."


How to avoid plagiarism:

There are many plagiarism-checking websites available to test your paper for plagiarism before submitting to a journal. Many journals will check your paper for plagiarism as well, whether or not you have had your manuscript checked beforehand, but it is better for the paper to be checked ahead of submission so that you can correct any potential problems, saving both time and embarrassment. Most plagiarism-checking sites provide these services for a fee, but some are free.  It is important to be aware that these free services often miss plagiarism from sources that are not easily accessed, or indicate plagiarism for commonly accepted phrases.

SciTechEdit International offers plagiarism checking for your scientific manuscripts and other documents, utilizing a number of applications and tools to highlight the plagiarized sections or passages, and will recommend corrections and rewording in the case of plagiarized text. In cases of the intellectual plagiarism of ideas, we will also note this for you. Contact us!

© SciTechEdit International

All Rights Reserved

Continue reading
  3412 Hits
3412 Hits

Social Media for Scientists - Why You Need to Be There

When it comes to social media use by scientists, some scientists are avid users, some dip their toe in occasionally, and some scientists areSTE BLOG rev 400x400 Social Media for Scientists simply on the sidelines with various reasons why they don't use social media. Many of those reasons are outdated or inadequate in today's digital age.

"The scientific discourse is moving online," says Paul Groth (@pgroth) - Assistant Professor, Dept. of Computer Science, VU University, Amsterdam 

Let's look at some of the reasons why many scientists are engaging in social media (especially Twitter), the benefits of participating, and the preferred platforms of avid users. 

600x1093 STE BLOG SM SCI. CHART USERS PER PLATFORM 800w x 2000h infographic size





























While ResearchGate has the largest number of users who primarily use it as an access point for contact, it is not functioning as a social network. 

Facebook has the largest number of users worldwide, and while many scientists have a profile there, they generally do not use it in a professional capacity, preferring to interact with family and friends rather than fellow scientists. 

LinkedIn is useful to scientists for having a profile visible to those who may contact them, and for jobs and peer connections. It is not actively used for sharing information or commenting.

Twitter is the preferred platform of scientists who use social media. Twitter is used by both early-career as well as tenure-level scientists. It offers a wide variety of benefits to scientists and has many active users from many disciplines.

For scientists, the benefits of using Twitter include:

  • Sharing your published research with scientists in your own and other disciplines
  • Getting your paper noticed above the competition of 2 million yearly published research articles
  • Sharing research published by others
  • Connecting with other scientists in your field, locally and globally
  • Gaining visibilty for your research papers, and possibly improving your citation numbers
  • Networking and engaging with peers
  • Sharing articles of interest with scientists in your field or for science at large
  • Connecting with potential collaborators for future research
  • Staying abreast of news in specific scientific disciplines and of general science interests
  • Staying informed of articles published by journals of interest
  • Connecting with conferences you are attending or cannot attend, as well as with other scientists interested in the conference by using the conference hashtag
  • Easy to find and follow anyone without needing permission
  • Easy to search for topics by keyword or hashtag
  • Can create lists of key accounts to see their tweets first or to catch up on missed tweets from those accounts
  • Easy to mute or block trolls, hiding them from your feed
  • Fast moving newsfeed allows sending important tweets at different times of day to reach more people without their seeing duplicates
  • Smart phone Twitter app makes using Twitter quick and easy
  • Joining regularly scheduled and hashtagged science chats to discuss specific topics with other scientists
  • Helps to establish your online presence in Google searches 
  • Teaches you to communicate clearly and succinctly within 140 characters
  • Allows communication of science with the lay public

Growth of Twitter users in the sciences is slow due to a few factors - fear, time, unsure of benefits, and unsure of how to use Twitter. Let's touch on a few of these:


FEAR OF EXPOSURE OR MAKING ERRORS, INTROVERSION - Scientists on Twitter for scientists are a fairly friendly group and happy to connect with other scientists. However, as in real life, you will find those who are not so friendly, but you have the choice to interact with them or not. You create your own Twitter feed of people you wish to follow, but others can follow you without you returning the follow. If anyone gets nasty you have the option to Mute or Block them. While Tweets can't be edited, if you make a terrible error, you can delete it and start over. 

If you are an introvert, don't worry! Introverts are welcome on Twitter and no one knows you are introverted! If you wish, you can begin by being an observer, known as a lurker in social media terminology, until you get the hang of Twitter. Most people begin as lurkers, so you will have plenty of company! You can set up your account to follow anyone and see their tweets in your feed to get the feel of how Twitter is used before you jump in and comment. Retweets are the easiest way to participate and show that your account is viable, and hashtags (a word or phrase following the # symbol, e.g. #SocialMediaForScientists) allow you to find others who share an interest.

FEAR OF NOT KNOWING HOW TO USE TWITTER - There are many articles available online for beginner "newbies" to learn how to use this platform and the terms used, but we will outline key points for you here. When you set up your account on Twitter you will need to choose a Twitter @ handle, or name. You will also have your own name on your account as well as your handle. By using your real name on your account and then a descriptive handle, you will be more easily found by your fellow scientists as well as show your interests. Here's an example:, which is the account for Dr. David Shiffman who goes by the handle @WhySharksMatter.

549x301 STE SM BLOG. Twitter acct Dr Shiffman WhySharksMatter

Twitter handles have a character limit of 15 characters so choose wisely, and the shorter the better. You can do a search directly on Twitter to see if your desired handle is taken or available. Twitter handles and images are no longer counted in the 140 character tweet limit, so that is a new help for users. More on tweets below.

You will also need a square profile picture of yourself to upload. Using a real photo or cartoon of yourself allows others to be sure they are connecting with the right person, especially is your name is a common one. The size of this image should be 400x400 pixels in JPG or PNG format. The large header image at the top of your account is also important to have as it shows you have an active account. You may choose something that represents your science or an image that you like. The Twitter recommended header image size should be 1500x500, again in JPG or PNG, but Twitter crops and compresses it automatically to fit all screens, and if you have important information at the edges, it can be cropped out. An image size of 1263x421 might be a better option to avoid Twitter resizing, and do upload the highest quality image you can. It is always better to reduce a larger image to the correct size than to expand a smaller image, because expanded smaller images are unclear. 

Quick way to find accounts to follow - For new users to find accounts to follow, try searching for a #hashtag of a word you are interested in and with that hashtag you will see the accounts that use it in their tweets or bio. Click on "Follow" and that account's tweets will appear in your Twitter feed. However, pay attention that the account is active and has recent tweets. Don't follow quiet accounts because it is a waste of your time. Once you have followed an account, you can click on their "Followers" and "Following" links at the top of their Twitter page on desktop (not available on phone) and you may see other accounts you wish to follow. 

Need ideas of accounts to follow? Try these:

The Top 50 Science Stars of Twitter (2014)   

The Best Science Twitter Accounts (Updated 2016)   

Here is an example of a Twitter hashtag search for #science, which includes that hashtag as it appears in biographies ("bios") and in tweets.


Speaking of Twitter bios, be sure you fill out your bio as completely and descriptively as possible (there is a 160 character limit for bios). Include your city and your personal website link if you have a site. 

Tweets - While tweets are limited to 140 characters (including spaces), you should compose your tweets using 120 characters to allow space for an addition @ handle in your tweet if needed. Also - and very important for Twitter's character limits - you should use a link shortener instead of the original long URL in your tweet. Twitter itself will shorten long links using its service. Shorteners will consume 23 characters (including of your allotment, but are better in the long run. If you use as a shortener, it offers analytics of who opened (and hopefully read!) your link. There are other shortener services available as well, including ones by Google, Hootsuite, and others.   

Retweets and Likes of your tweets by others will often gain you followers. Likewise, your retweets (RTs) and "Likes" of others' tweets can also gain you followers. The more followers you have, the more your tweets - and tweets of your own articles - are seen, so aim to have followers pertinent to your science and many of them. Yes, there will be questionable bot followers that you can easily block whether on phone or desktop. See image below for screenshots of blocking:

476x268 STE BLOG SM How to Block a Twitter Account phone or desktop 

Use images in your tweets whenever possible as they increase the visibility of your tweet in your followers' feed. Tweets with images are more eye-catching and usually get more Likes and Retweets. A little trick in the Twitterverse is that images can be used to share text beyond the 140 limit. Type your text in an image and attach it to your tweet. It's a great way to get around the 140 character limit. 

For a Twitter Glossary of Terms, see this link from the Twitter site, which has other helpful info too:

FEAR OF SELF-PROMOTION - Some say that their science should speak for itself. Well, no. If no one knows your research is there, your science cannot speak. You must speak for your science, sending it out into the world, making it visible using social media. This does not mean that you stand on a digital soapbox and shout. The science community on Twitter shares and discusses their research tastefully, earnestly, and without being cliche or spammy.  

Sharing a journal link to your published article on Twitter and including a descriptive hashtag is important for visibility and impact. Your tweet will oftentimes be retweeted, increasing the reach of your work to other scientists.

When you increase your reach and visibility, the likelihood of your research being cited is increased. 

IT TAKES TOO MUCH TIME! - In this digital age, we often acquire new things to do - sending and answering email, reading and learning online, even remembering to charge our devices and update software, among other duties. Participating on social media is another one of those new duties we've acquired, and we must make time for it.  

It isn't necessary to read all the tweets in the onslaught that is Twitter. Dip in and out during the day and evening. Use Twitter lists to follow key accounts that are most important to you. Use your smart phone Twitter app to participate from time to time when you have free moments. Use it when waiting in line, when awaiting results, when watching television during a commercial. You do not need to stay glued to Twitter. Nobody has time for that! Use Twitter when you can, but do make it a habit!  It is a great way to stay informed of new research, to stay connected to your community of scientists, to follow news, and to network with other scientists. Five or ten minutes here and there throughout the day is time that can be found by anyone to use Twitter. 

UNSURE OF THE PURPOSE OF TWITTER - With the thousands of articles published, journals themselves do not have the capacity to market your specific work. As McKinsey & Company stated back in 2011, "We're all marketers now". It is up to each scientist to gain visibility for their research, to discuss and explain their research to scientists both in and out of their fields, and to the media and general public. Participation in Twitter allows scientists to reach audiences not available before. Not everyone attends your presentation at conferences, your circle of colleagues may be small, and your research may be niche with an inherently small audience. Twitter enables you to broaden your reach and visibility, and your research can gain citations by other scientists just by the nature of your sharing it with the larger community. As the saying goes, "Don't hide your light under a basket". Let it shine for all to see! Tweet it!

Springer Nature now encourages sharing of content by researchers and makes it easy and legal to do so with their new initiative. This initiative is available for all of Springer Nature's owned journal portfolio and 1000 co-owned and partner-owned journals. They now provide authors and readers with shareable links to view-only PDFs of peer-reviewed research papers. The shareable links can be posted on social media platforms, authors' own websites, institutional repositories, and on scholarly collaborative networks. Open-access articles can be downloaded, printed, and saved by everyone. Subscribers can do the same for subscription articles.

As exciting as Twitter and other platforms are for sharing your published research to the scientific community, the media, and the public, be sure to be mindful of the embargo policies of the journal. These are important rules to follow as disobeying them may cause you trouble in publishing in the future. Embargo policies are found in the Instructions to Authors section of each journal. Here's a link to Nature's Embargo Policy as an example of special guidelines for authors relating to communication with other scientists:  

"Nature does not wish to hinder communication between scientists. For that reason, different embargo guidelines apply to work that has been discussed at a conference or displayed on a preprint server and picked up by the media as a result. (Neither conference presentations nor posting on recognized preprint servers constitute prior publication.)

Our guidelines for authors and potential authors in such circumstances are clear-cut in principle: communicate with other researchers as much as you wish, but do not encourage premature publication by discussion with the press (beyond a formal presentation, if at a conference)."

Elsevier has a Journal Embargo Finder for self-archiving embargo periods that you may find helpful: :

Other examples of embargo policies: 

Journal of American Chemical Society (JACS)

Journal of Gastroenterology


So now you are ready to participate and engage with the scientific community on Twitter! You've learned why it doesn't have to consume a lot of your time, and why it is important and essential to your research visibility to participate and speak for your work. Twitter can be a lot of fun too! Be sure to follow SciTechEdit International on Twitter! @SciTechEdit


This has been a guest post by Miller Finch of, Social Media for Scientists - and others! Follow @MillerFinchSM



Continue reading
  3198 Hits
3198 Hits

The Guide to Choosing the Best Science Journal for Publishing Your Research

STE rev HOW TO CHOOSE THE BEST SCIENCE JOURNAL FOR PUBLISHING YOUR RESEARCH 250x250From the idea to the proposal, the grant application, the lab bench work, field/clinical work, collaboration, and writing your notes, your scientific research has traveled a long road to get to your destination: getting published. Dissemination of your findings and ideas to your colleagues and the public is your crucial end goal.

Choose the journal BEFORE writing the manuscript. Your choice will help you to tailor the manuscript to the scope and audience of the journal, as well as journal requirements of formatting, space limitations, allowed abbreviations, etc. Knowing the rules ahead of time will save you time and work, and improve the likelihood that your work will be selected for peer review and publication.

How do you choose which journal is best to publish your research?

We have a few ideas and tips to help you in your publication path. Read on.

First, there are two easy-to-use online resources to help you decide which journal would be most pertinent to your research. The JANE (Journal/Author Name Estimator) and the Cofactor Science Journal selector.

JANE compares your document to Medline documents to find the best match. You can use your abstract or keywords to search JANE. More info on JANE can be found here: and FAQ here:

The journal selector at asks for five criteria and will search the journal possibilities for you that fit those criteria.

You may also want to look at Google Scholar Metrics, which indexes the top journals in the sciences, humanities, mathematics, and tech with citation h-indexes. Listings are for English publications as well as publications in other languages.

If you are still unsure of whether a journal is right for your findings, email the managing editor found on the “About” section of the journal’s website prior to your submission. Sending your abstract with an appropriate title will help the editor decide whether your paper is suitable for their journal (if they respond favorably, be sure to mention this in your cover letter).

There are other important factors to consider before deciding on your top three choices of journals, which should guide your selection:

1. Audience and Journal ScopeSTE rev. See which factors are importing in choosing a Science Journal
2. Journal Requirements
3. Language
4. Review Process
5. Time Frame for Acceptance
6. Acceptance-Rejection Rate
7. Online and Print Publication Time Frames
8. Journal Impact Factor
9. Open or Closed Access
10. Promotion & Sharing
11. Cost


The Audience:
Who is your target audience?
• Is your research for a general or specific audience? Who will be most interested in your results?
• Can your findings be clinically applied or are they theoretical?
• Are your findings specific to your field or are they broadly applicable?
• Are you introducing a new technique that may be useful to most scientists or to specific fields?

The Journal:
Is the journal general to a discipline or specific to a particular sub-discipline? Aside from multi-discipline journals such as Nature, Science, and PLOS ONE, generalist journals of a single discipline have a large audience and are highly prestigious. Niche journals are less widely read and not as prestigious because of the smaller audience.

How many copies of the journal are sold? Over 2500 top university libraries around the world generally subscribe to a multitude of journals; therefore, if your selected journal sells this many copies or more, the opportunity for your work to be seen and cited is much improved. Additionally, circulation that reaches a lay audience is important for publicizing your work.

How long has the journal been published and does it publish regularly? Beware of new journals that are similar in name to established journals as they may not be respectable, and may be predatory. It is unfortunate that Beall’s list of possible predatory journals is no longer published, but it can still be found in the web archives here.

Practical considerations are important in considering the best journal for your work. Article length, allowed numbers of figures, references, etc., vary by journal.

Be sure to read the journal’s Instructions to Authors/Guide for Authors to determine the limitations of the journal and whether your work will fit within those parameters. Some journals are stricter than others regarding their policies (particularly regarding article or section length). If in doubt, query the editor or check a recently published issue. Thoroughly review their policies before submission.

Examples of author guides and publication instructions can be found here:

Science journals
Journal of the American Chemical Society


Although the dominant language of science is English, there are journals in other languages that may be more pertinent to your findings and your intended audience.

SciTechEdit International is a leader in the field of translation of science documents to English from a wide variety of languages and offer our services to you should you need translations and/or editing of your manuscripts for publication in English-language science journals.

It is important to know if the journal uses a Single-, Double-, or Triple-Blind, or Open review process. In a Triple-Blind review, the editor and two or more reviewers are unaware of your identity and the reviews are anonymous. In a Double-Blind review, the editor knows your identity but the reviewers do not. In a Single-Blind review, the reviewers also know who you are. In an Open Review, you know who the reviewers are and they know who you are. Open Review offers a greater degree of transparency for the author and honesty by the reviewers.

The shorter the better for the time your paper reaches the journal and an editor replies with a decision. A long delay may mean that the journal is inefficiently run, has a weak reputation, or has difficulty securing expert reviewers. Conversely, a fast timeline may mean that the journal does not have enough quality submissions.

What is the percentage of submitted manuscripts that are published by the journal? While this should not be your deciding factor, it is an important consideration.

Medium acceptance/rejection rates are best for authors; journals with high rejection/low acceptance rates can increase the time and effort spent getting your article published, while high acceptance/low rejection rates can signify a new journal, or an unknown, risky, or desperate journal that will accept less than stellar submissions.

Note: If you want your findings published in top-tier journals, such as Science, Nature, NEJM, PNAS, and JACS, you must ensure that your manuscript strictly adheres to the journal scope and guidelines – SciTechEdit International can help to ensure that your manuscript conforms to the journal’s requirements.

What is the timeline from acceptance to online publication? Does the journal publish online continuously or wait to group papers into issues? What is the time frame for online publication to print? Will you receive a definite publishing date so that your promotional efforts do not run into embargo problems?

The theory of impact factor indicates how important that journal is to its scientific or academic field, but the value of the impact factor is controversial and should not be the sole deciding component for submitting your paper to a specific journal. Simply put, impact factor is citation count. There are multiple aspects to choosing a journal, impact factor being only one. Promotion and tenure decisions, however, especially in Japan and Europe, may give more weight to impact factor.

Other journal impact factor rankings are issued by PageRank and Eigenfactor.

High prestige journals are generally behind pay walls that restrict access without an expensive subscription. Open Access journals are open to all and have a much higher readership. However, most Open Access journals charge Author Processing Fees or place an embargo on publication.

Generally speaking, Open Access journals offer greater accessibility and dissemination to a broader audience, with a 47% increased probability of being referenced in Wikipedia vs. pay wall journals. See the article by Teplitskiy et al (J. Assoc. Information Sci Tech, 2016) for more details.

Publication of your manuscript is not the end of promoting your work. Promoting the published manuscript is important for increasing your presence and visibility in the scientific community, and to the media. With thousands of articles published daily, you must promote your research to the larger audience, thereby increasing your stature. Social media sharing, especially Twitter with its large science audience, is valuable to catch the eye of science journalists in major mainstream publications who may want to pursue an article featuring your research. Writing about your work on your personal blog is another way to gain visibility to the scientific community and the community at large.

Elsevier and other journal publishers have guidelines for sharing your research article, and encourage authors to do so. Click here to access their article on sharing and promoting your article

11. COST:
Publishing costs for journals vary and can be high. Costs can range from a few hundred dollars for Open Access digital publishing to approximately $4000 for print. These costs are borne by the researchers, though sometimes the author’s university or institution will cover the cost of publishing. Be sure to inquire about publishing fees if this is an issue for you.


We at SciTechEdit International hope this guide will be of help to you in determining which scientific journal is the best fit for you and your research findings.

We’d like to emphasize that whichever journal you choose for submission, be sure to first read the journal’s specific guidelines for submission as they can vary widely from journal to journal. Choose your journal BEFORE you write your findings, as this will save you enormous time and effort spent in re-writing, reformatting, and re-submitting your manuscripts to your second and third journal choices.

STE rev. Choose your Science Journal before writing

As always, SciTechEdit International is here to help you polish your scientific documents and help you to communicate your findings clearly. We are proud of our work in gaining a 94% publication rate for our clients, and we welcome you to contact us and learn more about how we can help you get published too.

Contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. with your queries.

Thank you.

 © 2017 SciTechEdit International.  Author: Karin Mesches, PhD  



Continue reading
  3702 Hits
3702 Hits